Who can make a claim against a deceased estate?

In Australia, the law recognises that a will maker may sometimes fail to make adequate provision for close family or dependants. In that situation, certain people can ask the Supreme Court for a share, or a larger share, of the deceased’s estate. This is usually called a family provision claim or a claim against a deceased estate. 

Although each state and territory has its own Act, they all broadly follow the same idea:

Who is generally allowed to claim?

The exact list differs slightly by state, but across Australia the following categories are commonly eligible: 

1. Spouses and de facto partners

2. Children

Biological and adopted children are generally eligible in every jurisdiction. 

Step-children may be eligible in some states either directly (for example in Victoria and Western Australia) or where they were financially dependent or part of the deceased’s household. 

3. Former spouses or partners

Most states allow a former spouse or domestic partner to claim, usually where there has not already been a full and final family law property settlement, or where there are special “factors warranting” an application. 

4. Other dependants

Many Acts also allow claims by:

Because the detail differs, someone who is eligible in one state may not be eligible in exactly the same way in another, so local advice is important.

Being eligible is only the first step

Even if you fit into one of these categories, the Court will not automatically change the will. It must decide whether, looking at all the circumstances, adequate provision has been made for you.

Across Australia, courts generally look at similar factors, such as: 

Judges often talk about “what a wise and just” person, or what the “community” would generally regard as fair in the circumstances would have done, without simply rewriting the will from scratch. 

Time limits and next steps

Time limits to make a family provision claim are strict and vary by state. The Court will only extend time beyond these time limits in limited situations. 

If you think you may have a claim, it is generally sensible to get prompt advice from a wills and estates lawyer. 

Christmas and tax

With the festive season fast approaching, business owners will be turning their mind to year-end celebrations with both employees and clients.

Knowing the rules around Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT), GST credits and what is or isn’t tax deductible can help keep tax costs to a minimum.

Holiday celebrations generally take the form of Christmas parties and/or gift giving.

Parties

Where a party is held during a working day, on business premises, attended by current employees only and costs less than $300 a head (GST inclusive), FBT does not apply. However, the cost of the function will not be tax deductible and GST credits cannot be claimed.

Where the function is held off business premises, say at a restaurant, or is also attended by employees’ partners, FBT applies where the GST-inclusive cost per head comes to $300 or more, the costs are tax deductible and GST credits are available.

However, FBT will not apply where the per person cost is below the $300 threshold if it can reasonably be regarded as an exempt minor benefit – ie, one that is only provided irregularly and infrequently. Where FBT does not apply because of the minor benefit rule, the cost will not be deductible and GST credits will not be available.

Where clients also attend, FBT will not apply to the cost applicable to them, but those costs will not be tax deductible and GST credits will not be available. Where there is a mix of attendees, you may need to keep track of who participated in the function.

Gifts

First, you need to work out whether the gift itself is in the nature of entertainment – for example, movie or theatre tickets, admission to sporting events, holiday travel or accommodation vouchers.

Where the recipient of an entertainment gift is an employee (or an associate of an employee) and the GST-inclusive cost is below $300, the minor benefit exemption should apply so that FBT is not payable, in which case the cost will not be tax deductible and GST credits are not claimable. For larger entertainment gifts to employees, however, FBT applies, the cost is deductible and GST credits can be claimed.

Where the gift is not in the nature of entertainment and it falls below $300, the FBT minor benefit exemption should apply – for example, Christmas hampers, bottles of alcohol, pen sets, gift vouchers. But because the entertainment rules don’t apply, the cost of the gift is tax deductible and GST credits are claimable.

Where a gift is made to a client, the $300 FBT minor benefit exemption falls by the wayside, but as long as it is not an entertainment gift and it was made in the reasonable expectation of creating goodwill and boosting future business it should be deductible to the business. GST credits are also claimable, while the amount is uncapped (within reason).

Best approach for employees

Provided partying is not a regular thing in your business, taking employees out for Christmas lunch escapes the FBT net, as long as the cost per head stays below the $300 threshold. While the cost of the function will be non-deductible, and no GST credits are available, that generally has less of a cash-flow impact on the business than the grossed-up FBT amounts.

For employees and their associates, non-entertainment gifts under $300 are a good way to go. Making a non-entertainment gift costing up to $299 is a very tax effective way of showing your appreciation. And because the $300 cap applies separately to each benefit, depending on how generous you feel, you could also make a gift costing up to $299 to the partner or spouse of an employee, which effectively doubles the $300 minor benefits cap.

Where the cost of a non-entertainment gift costing up to $299 is not subject to FBT, it will be tax deductible, with an entitlement to GST credits, giving you the best of both worlds.

Best approach for clients

While FBT is off the table for business clients, making a non-entertainment gift (tax deductible; no dollar limit within reason) is actually much more tax effective than wining and dining a key client (non-deductible entertainment). If you put some thought into what gift to buy a client and perhaps deliver it yourself, you might make much more of an impact than inviting them to share a restaurant meal in their already crowded Christmas calendar.

If you’re not sure and you need help in sorting out the tax treatment of your upcoming holiday celebrations and gifting, don’t hesitate to give us a call.

Renting your holiday home

With summer around the corner and beach holiday homes back on the agenda, perhaps it is time to revisit a few tax matters about their use.

And the big issue is how you claim expenses if your holiday home is only rented for part of the year.

Well, the ATO takes the view that you can claim expenses for the property based on the extent that they are incurred for the purpose of producing rental income, but that you’ll need to apportion your expenses if your property is available for rent for only part of the year. 

Moreover, it has to be genuinely available for rent! The ATO says that factors that may indicate a property isn’t genuinely available for rent include:

The ATO also requires you to apportion your expenses if you charge less than market rent to family or friends to use the property. And in this case, the general rule is that you can only claim expenses up to the amount of rent derived – so that you have a tax neutral outcome

Importantly, the ATO also says that it may not be appropriate to apportion all expenses on the same basis. For example, expenses that relate solely to the renting of your property are fully deductible and you don’t need to apportion them based on the time the property was rented out. Such expenses include real estate commissions and the costs of advertising for tenants 

And again you can’t claim a deduction for expenses that relate to periods when the property is not genuinely available for rent or periods when the property is used for a private purpose or for the part of the property that isn’t rented out; eg, the cost of cleaning your holiday home after you, your family or friends have used the property for a holiday or a repair for damage.

Oh, and finally just a word on selling the property. 

If you have never lived in it as your home, then you will be subject to CGT if you sell it (unless you bought it before 20 September 1985). And this will be the case regardless of whether you only used it as a holiday home or you partly rented it as well 

Importantly, in calculating the capital gain you can include in its cost all the non-deductible costs of owning or holding the property such as mortgage interest, insurance, repairs, council rates etc, – and even those costs of having the lawns mown regularly. However, you will need to have kept appropriate records of these expenses to do use them.

And of course, you are entitled to the 50% CGT discount to reduce the amount of any assessable gain.

These then are some of the important things about tax and holidays homes. But there are a lot more things that you need to know. So, come have a chat to us about it if you want.

Division 296 tax revisited

Big news for anyone with a large super balance – the government has gone back to the drawing board on the controversial Division 296 tax, and the changes are a big step toward fairness and common sense.

A quick recap

When the Division 296 tax was first announced in 2023, it caused an uproar. The main problem? It would have taxed unrealised gains, that is, paper profits you haven’t actually made yet and set a $3 million threshold that wasn’t indexed meaning it wouldn’t rise with inflation.

After a wave of feedback from the industry, the government has listened. The Treasurer’s new announcement, made in October 2025, fixes some of the biggest issues. The revamped version is designed to be fairer, simpler, and more in line with how tax usually works.

The plan is to start the new system from 1 July 2026, with the first tax bills expected in 2027–28.

What’s changing

Here’s what’s new under the revised Division 296 tax:

So what does this mean in practice? Think of it as a tiered tax system:

Basically, the more you have in super, the higher the tax rate on your earnings above those thresholds.

How it will work

Super funds will continue reporting members’ balances to the ATO, which will figure out who’s over the $3 million mark. If you are, your fund will tell the ATO your actual earnings (not paper gains). The ATO will then calculate how much extra tax you owe.

We don’t yet have the fine print on what exactly counts as “realised earnings,” but it’s likely to mean profits you’ve actually made, similar to how taxable income is treated now.

What’s still up in the air

While these updates make the system much fairer, there are still a few unanswered questions:

What it means for you

If your super balance is over $10 million, the proposed rules mean that a portion of your superannuation earnings could attract a higher tax rate of up to 40%.

For people with between $3 million and $10 million, the new system could also change how much tax applies to their super earnings, depending on how the final legislation defines “realised gains.”

But don’t rush. These rules aren’t law yet, and if you take your super out, it’s hard to put it back because of contribution limits. It’s best to wait for the final legislation and get professional advice before making any decision to withdraw benefits from super.

Reducing your tax bill while topping up your super

Let’s say you’ve just sold the house you inherited from your parents 12 years ago for $1.3 million. You’ve been renting it out for most of that time, but the property market has been hotting up and you were told by several real estate agents that they could get you a good price.

But what about the tax consequences?

At age 50, you’re still working (salary of $120,000 per annum), having returned to the workforce in July 2023 following a five-year absence for personal reasons. You don’t expect to retire from paid employment until age 65 at the earliest. Your total super balance on 30 June 2025 was $300,000, sitting in a retail fund.

Your accountant has calculated the net capital gain on selling Mum’s house as $600,000. After applying the 50% CGT discount, this results in a taxable income of $420,000, and a whopping tax bill of $163,538 to go with it.

Can anything be done?

Depending on your superannuation history, there may be a legitimate way of taking a big chunk out of that tax bill while topping up your super at the same time.

Concessional super contributions are subject to an annual cap, which is set at $30,000 for the 2025-26 income year. That figure is well above the mandatory employer super guarantee amount for most income levels. Many people don’t go close to using up their concessional contribution caps, which can leave them with carry-forward concessional contributions.

To help people with modest total super balances (below $500,000 on the previous 30 June), the government gives them the option of using some or all of their previously unused concessional contributions cap on a rolling basis for five years – ie, the five previous income years from 2020-21 to 2024-25, plus the current year (2025-26).

Conveniently, the ATO keeps track of your carry-forward concessional contributions balance, which you can look up on myGov.

The beauty of this arrangement is that you can use your catch-up concessional contributions to make personal deductible contributions, which can offset part of the CGT gain from the sale of the inherited property. Instead of being taxed at the top marginal rate of 47%, the amount of the catch-up contribution is taxed at the normal rate of 15% in your super fund, which creates a net saving of 32% on the contributed amount.

It is not unusual for someone to have carry-forward concessional contributions in excess of $100,000, which would take your taxable income down to $320,000, with tax payable of $116,538, or $47,000 less than what your tax bill would be without making the tax deductible catch-up contribution. That tax saving has to be reduced by $15,000 in contributions tax payable by your super fund, for a net saving of $32,000.

Remember, however, that any super contributions you make at age 50 will not be accessible until you reach preservation age (60 if retired or 65 if you’re still working). If you have other plans for that $100,000 (and you did pocket $1.3 million on the house sale) you will need to weigh up your options. But locking up a small part of the house proceeds seems like a small price to pay for a $32,000 tax saving.

On the other hand, if you have an appetite for putting even more money into your super, you might want to consider also making a non-concessional contribution of up to $360,000. This is not tax deductible and there is no 15% contributions tax when paid into your fund.

That covers the tax side of things but since you have received a life-changing windfall, you should consider getting advice from a licensed financial adviser.

If you find yourself in this situation, come in and see us well before 30 June 2026. If you decide to go ahead with making a catch-up contribution the super fund has to be notified, which we can help you with.

Helping your kids buy their first home using super

If you want to give your children a head start on saving for their first home, the First Home Super Saver Scheme (FHSSS) is worth considering. It offers a tax-effective way for young people to grow a deposit more quickly and is open to anyone who meets the eligibility rules and has never owned property.

What is the First Home Super Saver Scheme?

The FHSSS allows first-home buyers to make voluntary contributions into their super fund and later withdraw those funds, plus earnings, to put toward a home deposit.

Here’s how it works:

Children 18 or over can apply to withdraw the total voluntary contributions up to $50,000, plus notional earnings (currently 6.61%) on these contributions, to buy their first home. Whilst children must be at least 18 to withdraw an amount for their first home, they can start saving earlier.

Why use super to save for a home?

One advantage of using the FHSSS is the tax savings. Contributions made by way of personal deductible contributions or salary sacrifice reduce taxable income, which can mean less tax to pay.

In addition, any investment earnings on those contributions are taxed at only 15% inside super, compared to the saver’s marginal tax rate. When the funds are withdrawn under the FHSSS, the assessable portion is taxed at the saver’s marginal tax rate, but with a 30% offset applied. This means less tax and more savings to put toward a deposit. All this can mean more money is saved compared to saving in a regular bank account.

How parents can help

If your child is working and has a super fund, you can give them money, which they can then contribute themselves to their super fund. They may claim a tax deduction on the contribution and this may boost their after-tax income. Alternatively, they may choose not to claim a tax deduction. If your child is earning a low income and makes a personal after-tax contribution to super, they may be eligible for a government co-contribution of up to $500. Whilst this is a nice freebie, it cannot be withdrawn under the FHSSS, as it is not a personal contribution. 

Important note: You cannot contribute directly on your child’s behalf. The ATO requires the contribution to come from your child’s own bank account to be eligible for the FHSSS withdrawal.

When your child is ready to buy their first home, they apply through myGov to find out the maximum amount they can access under the scheme. Once they have this determination from the ATO, they can then request to withdraw up to that amount to use as part of their deposit.

The FHSSS comes with strict eligibility rules and timeframes, so it’s important to get the details right. If you’re thinking about helping your child save a deposit this way, give us a call. With some forward planning and the right contribution strategy, your child could boost their savings, cut down their tax bill, and step into their first home sooner.