Renting your holiday home
With summer around the corner and beach holiday homes back on the agenda, perhaps it is time to revisit a few tax matters about their use.
And the big issue is how you claim expenses if your holiday home is only rented for part of the year.
Well, the ATO takes the view that you can claim expenses for the property based on the extent that they are incurred for the purpose of producing rental income, but that you’ll need to apportion your expenses if your property is available for rent for only part of the year.
Moreover, it has to be genuinely available for rent! The ATO says that factors that may indicate a property isn’t genuinely available for rent include:
- It’s advertised in ways that limit its exposure to potential tenants; eg, the property is only advertised at your workplace or on restricted social media groups.
- The location, condition of the property, or accessibility of the property mean that it’s unlikely tenants will seek to rent it.
- You place unreasonable or stringent conditions on renting out the property that restrict the likelihood of renting out the property; eg, setting the rent above the rate of comparable properties in the area, requiring prospective users to give references for short holiday stays and conditions like “no children” and “no pets”.
- You refuse to rent out the property to interested people without adequate reasons.
The ATO also requires you to apportion your expenses if you charge less than market rent to family or friends to use the property. And in this case, the general rule is that you can only claim expenses up to the amount of rent derived – so that you have a tax neutral outcome
Importantly, the ATO also says that it may not be appropriate to apportion all expenses on the same basis. For example, expenses that relate solely to the renting of your property are fully deductible and you don’t need to apportion them based on the time the property was rented out. Such expenses include real estate commissions and the costs of advertising for tenants
And again you can’t claim a deduction for expenses that relate to periods when the property is not genuinely available for rent or periods when the property is used for a private purpose or for the part of the property that isn’t rented out; eg, the cost of cleaning your holiday home after you, your family or friends have used the property for a holiday or a repair for damage.
Oh, and finally just a word on selling the property.
If you have never lived in it as your home, then you will be subject to CGT if you sell it (unless you bought it before 20 September 1985). And this will be the case regardless of whether you only used it as a holiday home or you partly rented it as well
Importantly, in calculating the capital gain you can include in its cost all the non-deductible costs of owning or holding the property such as mortgage interest, insurance, repairs, council rates etc, – and even those costs of having the lawns mown regularly. However, you will need to have kept appropriate records of these expenses to do use them.
And of course, you are entitled to the 50% CGT discount to reduce the amount of any assessable gain.
These then are some of the important things about tax and holidays homes. But there are a lot more things that you need to know. So, come have a chat to us about it if you want.
Division 296 tax revisited
Big news for anyone with a large super balance – the government has gone back to the drawing board on the controversial Division 296 tax, and the changes are a big step toward fairness and common sense.
A quick recap
When the Division 296 tax was first announced in 2023, it caused an uproar. The main problem? It would have taxed unrealised gains, that is, paper profits you haven’t actually made yet and set a $3 million threshold that wasn’t indexed meaning it wouldn’t rise with inflation.
After a wave of feedback from the industry, the government has listened. The Treasurer’s new announcement, made in October 2025, fixes some of the biggest issues. The revamped version is designed to be fairer, simpler, and more in line with how tax usually works.
The plan is to start the new system from 1 July 2026, with the first tax bills expected in 2027–28.
What’s changing
Here’s what’s new under the revised Division 296 tax:
- Only real earnings will be taxed. No more tax on unrealised gains as you’ll only pay on earnings you’ve actually made.
- Super funds will work out members’ real earnings and report this to the ATO.
- The $3 million threshold will be indexed to inflation in $150,000 increments, keeping pace with rising costs.
- A new $10 million threshold will be introduced. Earnings above that will be taxed at a higher rate of 40%, and that threshold will also rise with inflation.
- The start date is pushed back to 1 July 2026, giving everyone more time to prepare.
- Defined benefit pensions are included, so all types of super funds are treated the same.
So what does this mean in practice? Think of it as a tiered tax system:
- Up to $3 million – normal super tax of 15%.
- Between $3 million and $10 million – taxed at 30%.
- Over $10 million – taxed at 40%.
Basically, the more you have in super, the higher the tax rate on your earnings above those thresholds.
How it will work
Super funds will continue reporting members’ balances to the ATO, which will figure out who’s over the $3 million mark. If you are, your fund will tell the ATO your actual earnings (not paper gains). The ATO will then calculate how much extra tax you owe.
We don’t yet have the fine print on what exactly counts as “realised earnings,” but it’s likely to mean profits you’ve actually made, similar to how taxable income is treated now.
What’s still up in the air
While these updates make the system much fairer, there are still a few unanswered questions:
- What exactly counts as “earnings”? Will it only include profits made after 1 July 2026, or could older gains that are sold later be included too?
- What happens with capital gains? Super funds usually get a one-third discount on capital gains for assets held over a year, but it’s unclear whether that will still apply.
- How will pension-phase income be handled? Some super income is tax-free when you’re in the pension phase, and we don’t yet know how that will interact with the new rules.
- Can people with over $10 million move money out? If your earnings above $10 million are taxed at 40%, you might want to shift funds elsewhere but the government hasn’t said if that’ll be allowed.
What it means for you
If your super balance is over $10 million, the proposed rules mean that a portion of your superannuation earnings could attract a higher tax rate of up to 40%.
For people with between $3 million and $10 million, the new system could also change how much tax applies to their super earnings, depending on how the final legislation defines “realised gains.”
But don’t rush. These rules aren’t law yet, and if you take your super out, it’s hard to put it back because of contribution limits. It’s best to wait for the final legislation and get professional advice before making any decision to withdraw benefits from super.
Reducing your tax bill while topping up your super
Let’s say you’ve just sold the house you inherited from your parents 12 years ago for $1.3 million. You’ve been renting it out for most of that time, but the property market has been hotting up and you were told by several real estate agents that they could get you a good price.
But what about the tax consequences?
At age 50, you’re still working (salary of $120,000 per annum), having returned to the workforce in July 2023 following a five-year absence for personal reasons. You don’t expect to retire from paid employment until age 65 at the earliest. Your total super balance on 30 June 2025 was $300,000, sitting in a retail fund.
Your accountant has calculated the net capital gain on selling Mum’s house as $600,000. After applying the 50% CGT discount, this results in a taxable income of $420,000, and a whopping tax bill of $163,538 to go with it.
Can anything be done?
Depending on your superannuation history, there may be a legitimate way of taking a big chunk out of that tax bill while topping up your super at the same time.
Concessional super contributions are subject to an annual cap, which is set at $30,000 for the 2025-26 income year. That figure is well above the mandatory employer super guarantee amount for most income levels. Many people don’t go close to using up their concessional contribution caps, which can leave them with carry-forward concessional contributions.
To help people with modest total super balances (below $500,000 on the previous 30 June), the government gives them the option of using some or all of their previously unused concessional contributions cap on a rolling basis for five years – ie, the five previous income years from 2020-21 to 2024-25, plus the current year (2025-26).
Conveniently, the ATO keeps track of your carry-forward concessional contributions balance, which you can look up on myGov.
The beauty of this arrangement is that you can use your catch-up concessional contributions to make personal deductible contributions, which can offset part of the CGT gain from the sale of the inherited property. Instead of being taxed at the top marginal rate of 47%, the amount of the catch-up contribution is taxed at the normal rate of 15% in your super fund, which creates a net saving of 32% on the contributed amount.
It is not unusual for someone to have carry-forward concessional contributions in excess of $100,000, which would take your taxable income down to $320,000, with tax payable of $116,538, or $47,000 less than what your tax bill would be without making the tax deductible catch-up contribution. That tax saving has to be reduced by $15,000 in contributions tax payable by your super fund, for a net saving of $32,000.
Remember, however, that any super contributions you make at age 50 will not be accessible until you reach preservation age (60 if retired or 65 if you’re still working). If you have other plans for that $100,000 (and you did pocket $1.3 million on the house sale) you will need to weigh up your options. But locking up a small part of the house proceeds seems like a small price to pay for a $32,000 tax saving.
On the other hand, if you have an appetite for putting even more money into your super, you might want to consider also making a non-concessional contribution of up to $360,000. This is not tax deductible and there is no 15% contributions tax when paid into your fund.
That covers the tax side of things but since you have received a life-changing windfall, you should consider getting advice from a licensed financial adviser.
If you find yourself in this situation, come in and see us well before 30 June 2026. If you decide to go ahead with making a catch-up contribution the super fund has to be notified, which we can help you with.
Helping your kids buy their first home using super
If you want to give your children a head start on saving for their first home, the First Home Super Saver Scheme (FHSSS) is worth considering. It offers a tax-effective way for young people to grow a deposit more quickly and is open to anyone who meets the eligibility rules and has never owned property.
What is the First Home Super Saver Scheme?
The FHSSS allows first-home buyers to make voluntary contributions into their super fund and later withdraw those funds, plus earnings, to put toward a home deposit.
Here’s how it works:
- They can contribute up to $15,000 per financial year, and up to $50,000 total, in voluntary contributions.
- These contributions can be either:
- Concessional contributions (CC) such as salary sacrifice or personal deductible contributions
- Non-concessional contributions (NCC) which is after-tax money contributed from their own savings for which no deduction will be claimed
Children 18 or over can apply to withdraw the total voluntary contributions up to $50,000, plus notional earnings (currently 6.61%) on these contributions, to buy their first home. Whilst children must be at least 18 to withdraw an amount for their first home, they can start saving earlier.
Why use super to save for a home?
One advantage of using the FHSSS is the tax savings. Contributions made by way of personal deductible contributions or salary sacrifice reduce taxable income, which can mean less tax to pay.
In addition, any investment earnings on those contributions are taxed at only 15% inside super, compared to the saver’s marginal tax rate. When the funds are withdrawn under the FHSSS, the assessable portion is taxed at the saver’s marginal tax rate, but with a 30% offset applied. This means less tax and more savings to put toward a deposit. All this can mean more money is saved compared to saving in a regular bank account.
How parents can help
If your child is working and has a super fund, you can give them money, which they can then contribute themselves to their super fund. They may claim a tax deduction on the contribution and this may boost their after-tax income. Alternatively, they may choose not to claim a tax deduction. If your child is earning a low income and makes a personal after-tax contribution to super, they may be eligible for a government co-contribution of up to $500. Whilst this is a nice freebie, it cannot be withdrawn under the FHSSS, as it is not a personal contribution.
Important note: You cannot contribute directly on your child’s behalf. The ATO requires the contribution to come from your child’s own bank account to be eligible for the FHSSS withdrawal.
When your child is ready to buy their first home, they apply through myGov to find out the maximum amount they can access under the scheme. Once they have this determination from the ATO, they can then request to withdraw up to that amount to use as part of their deposit.
The FHSSS comes with strict eligibility rules and timeframes, so it’s important to get the details right. If you’re thinking about helping your child save a deposit this way, give us a call. With some forward planning and the right contribution strategy, your child could boost their savings, cut down their tax bill, and step into their first home sooner.
Car claims for electric vehicles
Working out the cost of electricity used to run your electric vehicle (EV) where you use the vehicle for business purposes and you use the logbook method for making your claim for car expenses is a little more complex than monitoring the cost of fuel used to run an all petrol vehicle. You need to keep certain records and make some choices along the way.
But first, a quick look at some of the basic rules around tax claims for the business use of cars, including EVs.
What trips are eligible?
Costs incurred in running your car for business purposes can be deducted using one of several methods. The term “business purposes” includes:
- Attending meetings or conferences away from your usual place of work
- Collecting supplies or delivering items
- Travel between two separate places of work (eg, for a second job)
- Travel from your home or your usual place of work to an alternative worksite (eg, a client’s office or worksite), and
- Itinerant work, where the job requires you to work at more than one location each day before going home.
Travel between your home and your usual place of work is only deductible in quite limited circumstances – eg, when transporting bulky equipment to and from a worksite.
Cents per kilometre up to 5,000 business kilometres per year
For many taxpayers, the statutory safe harbour rate of 88 cents per kilometre for the 2025-26 income year for up to 5,000 business kilometres can be the best way of claiming their car expenses. It gets you a deduction of up to $4,400 without having to keep any receipts.
The cents per kilometre method covers all car expenses, including depreciation, registration and insurance, repairs and maintenance, and fuel costs. If you use this method, you can’t add any of these costs on top of the cents per kilometre amount. The cents per kilometre method applies the EVs (including plug-in hybrids – PHEVs) as well as petrol only cars.
If you use this method, you will need to keep records that show how you have worked out your business related kilometres. That can be done by way of a travel diary that covers the entire income year. You also need to show that you own or lease the car.
Logbook method
The cents per kilometre method will not always be optimal for everyone. If you have a high percentage of business use of the car, the logbook method may well give you a better result. But you will need to keep receipts or other evidence of all your car expenses, as well as completing a logbook for a representative and continuous 12-week period. The logbook needs to show the destination and purpose of each business trip, as well as the total kilometres travelled. It also needs to show the opening and closing odometer readings for the logbook period. The percentage of business use is worked out using the logbook and is applied to the total costs attributable to running the car.
The logbook can be relied upon for five years, unless your pattern of use changes significantly (eg, if you move house or the nature of your job changes). If that happens, you will have to complete a new 12-week logbook.
Having completed the logbook, and for a non-electric car, you then need to keep receipts for fuel and oil expenses, or make a reasonable estimate of those expenses based on opening and closing odometer readings, standard fuel use by your car (per the manufacturer) and average petrol prices for the income year (per the Australian Institute of Petroleum website). You should also keep receipts or other evidence of what you’ve spent on registration and insurance, repairs and maintenance, lease payments and interest charges. You should also have a record of the cost of the car and show how you have worked out your depreciation claim.
You then apply your business use percentage to the total running costs and there’s your claim for car expenses.
Electric vehicles
EVs are typically charged at both commercial charging stations and using home chargers. You need to keep a record of the cost of using commercial charging stations, which should be straight-forward enough.
For home charging, however, the electricity usage for charging EVs is combined with the total electrical consumption of the household, and cannot generally be separately identified.
Unless your EV is capable of reporting the percentage of home charging, the best basis for claiming electricity costs is to use the Commissioner’s home charging rate of 4.2 cents per kilometre to the total distance travelled by the EV during the year of income. The 4.2 cents per kilometre home charging rate covers all electricity costs for the EV, so if you use this method, you cannot also claim the cost of using commercial charging stations.
Where you are able to determine the home charging vs commercial charging station percentage, you can work out the total number of kilometres attributable to your home charging, multiplying those kilometres by the 4.2 cents EV home charging rate and then adding any commercial charging station costs.
You must still keep receipts substantiating your commercial charging station costs, keep an electricity bill and record your opening and closing odometer readings. Having calculated your electricity costs you add it to all the other car running costs (including depreciation) and claim the business proportion as per your logbook.
Plug-in Hybrids (PHEV)
PHEVs are trickier than EVs since they use petrol as well as electricity. The ATO has come up with a seven-step method statement for calculating the combined petrol and electricity costs applicable to a PHEV which we won’t bore you with here.
What you need to keep for our lodgement meeting are:
- Your PHEV’s actual petrol and oil costs for the period
- Opening and closing odometer readings, and
- Your PHEV’s Condition B test cycle fuel economy figure (per the manufacturer).
We will do the rest and ensure you are claiming your legitimate entitlement.
Tax on redundancy payments explained
If you’re made redundant, you may receive a lump sum payout. While this can provide financial breathing room, it’s important to understand how that money is taxed. Not all parts of a redundancy payment are taxed the same and how it is taxed can make a big difference to what you actually take home.
If your position is terminated, you might receive various payments, including:
- Unused annual or long service leave
- Payment in lieu of notice
- A severance payout
- Additional “ex-gratia” or goodwill payments
Some of these are taxed as regular income, others may be taxed concessionally and some may even be tax-free if it is treated as a ‘genuine redundancy’ amount.
What is a genuine redundancy?
A redundancy is considered genuine if your role no longer exists and is not being replaced. You must also be under age 67 at the time of termination to access tax-free benefits. If you’re dismissed due to poor performance or you resign voluntarily, it doesn’t count as a genuine redundancy.
Tax-free threshold for genuine redundancy
If your redundancy is genuine, part or all your payout can be received tax-free.
For the 2025–26 financial year, the tax-free amount is $13,100 + $6,552 for each full year of service.
For example, if you’ve worked 10 years, your tax-free threshold is:
$13,100 + ($6,552 × 10) = $78,620
Any payment above that amount may be taxed as an employment termination payment (ETP).
How are ETPs taxed?
ETPs can include payments like severance pay, golden handshakes, or unused sick leave. How these are taxed depends on your age and how much you receive.
If you’re under 60, payments under the ETP cap ($260,000 in 2025–26) are taxed at up to 30%. If you’re 60 or older, the rate drops to 15%. Anything above the cap is taxed at 45%.
On top of the ETP cap, there is also a ‘whole-of-income cap’ that applies to high income earners. This cap limits how much certain termination payments can qualify for concessional tax treatment.
Unused leave is taxed differently
Payments for unused annual or long service leave are taxed at different rates depending on whether your termination is a genuine redundancy or not. Generally, these are taxed at a maximum rate of 30% if it is a genuine redundancy. If you resign or retire, your unused leave payments will generally be taxed at your marginal tax rate, plus Medicare levy.
Some tips to reduce tax
You may be able to contribute part of your redundancy payment to super and claim a tax deduction, especially if you have unused concessional cap space from previous years. The catch-up rules allow you to use any unused portions of the concessional contributions cap (currently $30,000) from the past five financial years, as long as your total super balance was under $500,000 at the previous 30 June.
This strategy can help offset the taxable portion of your redundancy payment, lowering your overall tax bill while boosting your retirement savings.
Key message
Redundancy payments can be complex, with different components taxed in different ways. Knowing the rules and using strategies like super contributions can make a big difference to what you keep. If you’re facing redundancy and want to understand your options, give us a call. We can help you plan ahead, minimise tax, and make the most of your payout.